Look for detailed descriptions of their Products: Flower, including strain information and THC/CBD content
You're trusting the brand name more than any published data
Applying Bayess rule, we have odds(smoker | cancer) = odds(smoker) * p(cancer | smoker) / p(cancer | non-smoker) Rearranging terms, we can solve for the risk ratio: p(cancer | smoker) / p(cancer | non-smoker) = odds(smoker | cancer) / odds(smoker) = 16 Thats the answer I had in mind, but let me address an objection raised by one poll respondent, who chose Other because, You cant draw casual inferences from observational data without certain assumptions which Im unwilling to make. Thats true
Corn husk filters have been found to hold moisture, making them potential breeding grounds for microbials like aspergillus and potentially not the best choice for a pre-rolled cone or tube
Description In a smoky haze, a glamorous woman exudes confidence and allure, holding a cigarette as she gazes into the distance
On Thursday, the US Food and Drug Administration announced plans to move ahead with an initiative that could drive down the US smoking rate much, much further